The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know we talked about in the white paper another is that there's no there's no intentionality it's simply um something's gone wrong and something breaks and that leads to increased fat storage and that gets into you know what linoleic acid turns into in our body and how that toxin starts breaking things and leading to Fat gain and that's less about an evolutionary uh evolutionarily conserved you know intentional mechanism and more just about things going wrong
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.