The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it looks at um macronutrient distribution in uh it's a six-month trial done in the people's republic of china they took uh 307 people and the only thing they changed in these people's diets they were young and they had a bmi less than 28 years old they were less than 28 they were 18 to 35 years old so they were not um fat they were they were slim young men and women uh it was a six month study it was a controlled feeding study they controlled everything about the diets
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.