The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there was a 22 percent higher risk of death for each 30 milligrams per deciliter reduction in serum cholesterol in the polyunsaturated group now the minnesota coronary experiment let me be clear this is a double-blind randomized controlled trial this is an interventional trial where saturated fat was replaced with vegetable oil rich in linoleic acid and they're showing that the more you reduce the cholesterol the higher the risk of death
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but there was about a 30 milligram per deciliter reduction in total cholesterol on the low low saturated fat Group which again now you have a biomarker that tells you this this intervention worked right