We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
no chronometer know my food pal is going to be able to tell you how much of those nutrients you are absorbing and the idea that we are absorbing way less of the minerals and plants because of phytic acid and I would argue way less of the B vitamins and plants because they're bound to glycoproteins which suggests that we should like if you did that calculation with chronometer a diet that has plants in it would look a lot less appealing from a micronutrient perspective
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.