The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
For example, you can have a smaller lunch so you don't have too much disturbance to your physiology and you can fight off that postprandial intake. Or since bright light actually makes us more alert, then maybe having that lunch outdoor, under a canopy, or maybe going for a short walk after lunch will keep you awake.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.