The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in 1977 George McGovern presiding over the Senate Select Committee on health basically comes to the conclusion that even though the evidence against or implicating saturated fat and heart disease even though that evidence is not great it's good enough and they have to make and make a decision and the decision that's put forth at that time is that Americans should greatly reduce their intake of saturated fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.