The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The best case scenario is that the you could have more rigor I think if you did it more frequently because obviously I think you know I if I asked you what you had for breakfast this morning I think you probably have more confidence in the answer than what did you have for breakfast on January uh third of of last year
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
imagine if you got a food frequency questionnaire that was uh maybe more technologically advanced where you got like a it's it's an app where you literally recall at the end of each day what did I eat today or even after your each meal