Paul Saladino· MD
the correlative data also demonstrate that when sugar consumption is moderate but harmful vegetable oil consumption remains extremely low or absent, the prevalence of age-related macular degenerate generation remains rare
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the correlative data also demonstrate that when sugar consumption is moderate but harmful vegetable oil consumption remains extremely low or absent, the prevalence of age-related macular degenerate generation remains rare
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the correlated data in 25 nations show that increasing sugar and polyunsaturated vegetable oil consumption is invariably associated with new onset or rising prevalence of age-related macular degeneration generally within 30 to 40 years of the beginning of increasing consumption of these proxy markers of processed food consumption