We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I have a lot of problems with the RDA approach and one of them is that it doesn't take into account anti-nutrients so so you have this idea where you're adding everything up and everything that you add in is supposed to add extra value but something things you can add in that are actually going to subtract value it is a very serious problem if you've got phytates or fiber even from from a high grain diet that's completely different
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.