The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
modern fruit which you and I both know are is significantly different from fruit from either even 100 years ago 200 years ago um 300 years ago there was no such thing as the big luxurious banana and the humongous papaya and the humongous pineapple those things have been crossbred through you know decades to make them basically huge sacks of sugar that tastes amazing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.