Rhonda Patrick· PhD
IMO, best to base on long-term functions.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
IMO, best to base on long-term functions.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the RDA you may be familiar with is is usually Set uh a couple of standard deviations above what would be uh required to prevent uh deficiency which could cause acute death um but these micronutrient these recommended daily allowances are are not even being met
His whole stick was RDAs are like to prevent deficiency, you know, and that they're just not adequate, you know.