The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you're going to eat carbs you probably should spend your carbs on the part of the plant that the plant actually wants you to ingest and you should probably completely avoid the part of the plant that the plant definitely does not want you to destroy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you're going to eat carbs you probably should spend your carbs on the part of the plant that the plant actually wants you to ingest and you should probably completely avoid the part of the plant that the plant definitely does not want you to destroy