Paul Saladino· MD
there's the nuance with fructose it's not so much to fear fructose it's to fear toast when it's processed
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's the nuance with fructose it's not so much to fear fructose it's to fear toast when it's processed
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i've done lots of podcasts on fructose and why i don't think it's a problem i don't think fructose makes any sense to be bad for humans in the context of a food matrix rather than a processed thing like sucrose and table sugar totally different story