The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you have a cohort of people say the nurses health study the most famous in the us you know 110 000 nurses and you give them questionnaires food frequency questionnaires and you ask them what they're eating and they tell you what they're eating and then you follow them and you see who gets sick and who doesn't
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you have an association between diet and disease and there's no causal information in that association