The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, um this is to say that in me, in Paul Saladino, as a metabolically healthy human who has avoided seed oils like the plague, I was able to eat honey uh and fruit in that continuous glucose monitor that we looked at from a few years ago and have a normal postprandial response. Now, someone with diabetes or metabolic dysfunction may not have the same response because they have a different baseline than me.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.