The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So in these poorest communities, SNAP, which is food stamps, so supplemental nutrition assistance program is used significantly. So at a governmental level, I think we could help things by not allowing food stamps to be able to be used to buy junk food.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So at a governmental level, I think we could help things by not allowing food stamps to be able to be used to buy junk food. So I think it's the food stamp budget I think is 112 or$15 billion a year that goes out to people. 70 plus% of that gets used by people on junk food. What that that's the problem right that I think fixes a big part of this. If you disallow the use of food stamps for junk food you make you make a big step in the right direction.