The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's all sorts of reports in the literature that never get talked about by plant-based news sources of all kinds of nutritional deficiencies in the developing world related to over-consumption of things like cassava which is a root that has many anti-nutrients cyanogenic glycosides isothiocyanates et cetera and and grains and just it's prevalent and it's it's just pervasive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's all sorts of reports in the literature that never get talked about by plant-based news sources of all kinds of nutritional deficiencies in the developing world related to over consumption of things like cassava which is a root that has many anti-nutrients cyanogenic glycosides isothiocyanates et cetera and and grains and just it's prevalent and it's it's just pervasive