The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but even when I was with the haja they loved honey and berries but eating freshly killed animals is not low carb right and so we have the animal meat wouldn't have stayed long enough to become very low carb perhaps some of it would have if you're drying it is jerky right but I mean at least a good portion of the animal meat and livers was eaten fresh by all the people in the tribe and even if you're just eating an animal kill there's glycogen in there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
our ancestors appeared to have a lot of their protein from animal sources based on carbon nitrogen and sulfur dating of the of the of the remains of the bones of them — the stable isotope studies — there's no Refrigeration 50 100 000 years ago they were probably not low carb