The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
like for example fruit you know blueberries provide anthocyanins would you say that those have a net benefit like you could you know or mango provides mangosteen you know apple provides uh ursolic acid like would you say that these things are either benign aka they don't hurt us or beneficial for humans and that you would be okay with their consumption because they are present in fruit
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.