The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
some of the concern that Paul had originally was that an exceptionally low carbohydrate intake would leave inadequate glucose and carbohydrate substrates for the gut bacteria in these bacteria would then go looking at the kind of glycoprotein or layer within the gut and that that might get whittled away and and then we have direct contact between the gut contents and the intestinal you know layer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.