The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in fact about the most amino acids you can deposit in muscle tissue if you let me back up if you look at somebody who added 50 pounds of muscle tissue in a year right that's a ton of muscle even for somebody on steroids i think we can agree that's a ton of muscle when you account for the fact that muscle tissue is about 70 water in about 30 protein you're basically looking at about 10 grams of amino acids deposited in muscle per day it's very underwhelming
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because we know that in muscle protein synthesis about seven out of every eight amino acids used to create a new protein are recycled from degraded proteins
that means that going off for for 70 grams for one gram a day for 70 kilogram weighing man that would be you're recycling 230 grams and this is something that people don't realize so yes we consume foods and we need those building blocks but you're also con con constantly using amino acids that are that are being released from the breakdown of tissues and then you use them again so you're making 300 gram you're only ingesting 70 grams so that means I'm a 20 on a on a on a 24-hour basis you're recycling 230 grams of amino acids from your own body so you're very sustainable