The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the accurate statement here is that our brain always needs some glucose but for sure we have this amazing ability this amazing biochemical ability to make glucose from a variety of things we can make glucose from lactate we can make glucose from the glycerol backbone or triglycerides we can make glucose from gluconeogenic amino acids and protein this is through the process of gluconeogenesis and that's what our liver does when we are not taking in glucose
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so you know we can do gluconeogenesis right so our bodies are always gonna have glucose and we can make gluconeogenic amino acids which about which is about half of them into glucose and the other and home there's a few of them we could even make into ketones and we can also take the glycerol backbone from triglycerides and make that you know into into glucose and and so we have substrates to make glucose