The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in a plant the the protein is there for the purpose of the plant and so a lot of it is attached to fibers it's the structures you know we have that plants have proteins attached to the leaves and the stems and The Roots and the flowers and and uh the seeds and you know when you start to isolate that uh if you just eat it in a raw form uh it may only be 60 70% available uh because we can't digest the fiber
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.