The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So every time you eat, your body temperature elevates. It’s why people sweat after they eat, you know, because it’s not a fever per se, because I don’t think it is... I don’t know whether upper regular is a thermal related set point, but we’ve known for years that, and again you think about well why, partly because you’ve got to burn off the energy, but it may also be that again hyperthermia has antibiotic effects, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.