The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
yeah it's not something you're going to eat it's not like and it speaks to the idea that so many of the foods that at least in this region of africa lake eosy and tanzania they don't look like things we have in the supermarket they don't have carrots like this they don't have kale like this and it's just not the same type of food it looks different we've certainly done things to hybridize these foods evolutionarily
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.