The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
treatment of rectal cancer with a paleolithic ketogenic diet 24-month follow-up again the same thing um the patient uh postponed surgery for two years on the pkd diet so paleolithic ketogenic diet a carnivore diet when the patient was strictly adhering to the diet the tumor regressed
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
call it pkd but this is showing that the patient has been on the diet for 20 months without symptoms or side effects and they conclude it's safe and effective and the tumor progression has been halted in that patient certainly not worsened really interesting study there
is one uh halted progression of soft palate cancer in a patient treated with the paleolithic ketogenic diet alone 20 month follow-up pkd the paleolithic ketogenic diet is a carnivore diet it's a group in hungary they call it pkd but this is showing that the patient has been on the diet for 20 months without symptoms or side effects and they conclude it's safe and effective and the tumor progression has been halted in that patient
furthermore there is they have published other case reports looking at rectal cancer so treatment of rectal cancer with a paleolithic ketogenic diet 24-month follow-up again the same thing um the patient uh postponed surgery for two years on the pkd diet so paleolithic ketogenic diet a carnivore diet when the patient was strictly adhering to the diet the tumor regressed