The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
cancer incidents and vegetarians results from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition this is epic Oxford I wonder why the iarc left this one out it's from 2009 so it was definitely published they said the incidence of colorectal cancer was higher in vegetarians than in meat eaters
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.