The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
how it's actually not uncommon for people to load up too much through processed foods on the soluble fibers but they're not getting the full benefit without having the insoluble which is really stuff that's hard to get without looking towards real foods particularly vegetables
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
he is not just talking about avoiding sugar he's also talking about the importance of fiber and we actually get into a very nice discussion about the differences between soluble and insoluble fiber and how it's actually not uncommon for people to load up too much through processed foods on the soluble fibers but they're not getting the full benefit without having the insoluble which is really stuff that's hard to get without looking towards real foods particularly vegetables