The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you've got something like a 5,000 fold increase in epidermal growth factor which we have in our saliva to help repair the gut we're in small quantities but then someone consumes milk and it's meant for not for a human and you have a 5,000 fold increase it up regulates that receptor and all of a sudden you've got a lot more of these elections getting into the systemic system
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you've got something like a 5,000 fold increase in epidermal growth factor which we have in our saliva to help repair the gut we're in small quantities but then someone consumes milk and it's meant for a calf not for a human and you have a 5,000 fold increase it up regulates that receptor and all of a sudden you've got a lot more of these lectins getting into the systemic system