The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the root cause is the lack of nutrients and so you have to kind of go back to process work to see that well actually if this was happening as we were going off the diet so why why did it ever happen in the first place is because the nutrients weren't there to give the growth signals for this jaw to grow in the first place
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but the root cause is the lack of nutrients and so you have to kind of go back to process work to see that well actually if this was happening as we were going off the diet so why why did it ever happen in the first place is because the nutrients weren't there to give the growth signals for this jaw to grow in the first place