The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, this is what my work is all about. This is what Carnivore MD 2.0 is about. It's about an evolution of Carnivore MD, starting off as a carnivore and now including fruit and honey and raw dairy, always wanting to evolve, always wanting to question, never wanting to become calcified but always wanting to learn.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.