Paul Saladino· MD
And in fact, when we look at humans in the presence of new5GC antibodies, which is shown very clearly in this study, um then we see that this having a new5GC antibody probably isn't that big a deal.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
And in fact, when we look at humans in the presence of new5GC antibodies, which is shown very clearly in this study, um then we see that this having a new5GC antibody probably isn't that big a deal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
which essentially debunks the notion that new 5gc is harmful for humans at all