Paul Saladino· MD
and they don't have vitamin k and i thought well that's just wait how did they say that because because all the nutritional databases only have vitamin k1 which
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and they don't have vitamin k and i thought well that's just wait how did they say that because because all the nutritional databases only have vitamin k1 which
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
oftentimes when people have tried to make the challenge it's just that the USDA database doesn't actually include include those nutrients in the foods that I'm eating for instance the USDA database doesn't even look at Vitamin K2