The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the same you know if we appreciate the children can have an anaphylactic shock if they have a peanut allergy surely it shouldn't be too much of a stretch to realize that a low level inflammation or something like an autoimmune response could be as a result of slightly high levels or even the same amount of levels if it can create such a shock to a child
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.