The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if I was getting ready for a bodybuilding show for example I would have to change how I do things like I couldn't just you know go out and just kind of guesstimate like that I would have to get much more granular and now the sacrifice might be okay maybe I'll still go out to eat but I'm gonna have to take all the ingredients put them on my scale and you know and then and then track
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if I was getting ready for a bodybuilding show for example I would have to change how I do things like I couldn't just you know go out and just kind of guesstimate like that I would have to get much more granular and now the sacrifice might be okay maybe I'll still go out to eat but I'm gonna have to take all the ingredients put them on my scale and you know and then which sucks but no I mean look that's if that's what you're doing that's what you're doing like that's that's the price you have to pay to get that good