We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
you got no barnard going on London real and comparing eating meats to you know smoking cigarettes or eating cheese to taking heroin I mean how are parents of kids were you know being fed meat and animal products gonna feel like you know if there's this physician telling them that they're essentially you know promoting lung cancer in their you know in their babies and children it's just a counterproductive and if false statements
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.