The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the nutrition science today is you know it's far from giving us a kind of clear picture of what is a hundred percent optimal and what is not 100 percent optimal and you know it's not a reflective of you know the truth the objective truth out there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think me and you both can agree that the nutrition science today is you know is far from giving us a kind of clear picture of what is a 100% optimal and what is not 100% optimal and you know it's not a reflective of you know the truth the objective truth out there