The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but in Ramon's analysis you actually saw the opposite because he now looked at some subgroups and you actually saw a higher incidents of coronary events in some of the people that were consuming the high polyunsaturated fat diet and I can't remember what the dominant oil was I'm blanking on it I don't remember if it was canola or safflower I think it was safflower
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.