The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for some people perhaps and again this is going to depend on macronutrient ratios perhaps 50 to 60 percent of the calories coming from animal foods is a good place to start but again that depends on macronutrient ratios if they're eating a higher fat animal-based diet then they may have more calories coming from animal foods and less coming from carbohydrates
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.