We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
it is staggeringly incomprehensible to me why these major organizations the aah eh the Mayo Clinic continued to say that saturated fat is bad for humans continue to say that animal fats are bad for humans in the face of gathering large amounts of evidence to the contrary
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
eat healthy fats and this is where I start to differ very strongly from the Mayo Clinic and feel like they are extremely Antiquated and anachronism in the medical world they say that the unsaturated fats both monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats promote healthy blood cholesterol levels and good heart and vascular health