We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
what ends up happening is that a lot of people who experiment with these diets actually position themselves not to regrow hair but to develop a diet specific nutrient deficiency or caloric deficiency that accelerates or exacerbates bouts of telogen effluvium and then it just feeds right back into the process of pattern hair loss
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.