The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Well, but top ramen is pretty expensive when you think about the nutrient There's no nutrient They're going to spend a lot of money on top ramen to get any sort of Basically, you spend infinite amounts of money because there's no nutrients, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well Top Ramen is cheaper well but Top Ramen is pretty expensive when you think about the Nutri there's no new they're going to spend a lot of money on Top Ramen any sort of basically you'd spend infinite amounts of money because there's no nutrients