The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's not like they're looking the world is their oyster and they can go out like they're in the produce section of the grocery store they are limited if they don't have a technology to detoxify plants they are very limited into the plants that they could eat so it's by default hyper seasonal by default hyper local and their their selection is incredibly limited because there's not that many um plants that are safe enough to consume for threat you know
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.