Paul Saladino· MD
even if certain ingredients are studied we have never ever studied what the cumulative exposure of all those chemicals together in our food system are doing to our cellular biology
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even if certain ingredients are studied we have never ever studied what the cumulative exposure of all those chemicals together in our food system are doing to our cellular biology
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a little bit of the BHT doesn't really matter a little bit of the and you know blah blah blah a little bit of the fetes a little bit of the forever chemicals well a little bit of all this crap I have a feeling is doing something to our cellular biology
there is basically a war against studying cumulative exposure