The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I'm not going to go eating bitter leaves if I can hunt something that has more nutritional value more calories and more payoff to me in the end I might eat some leaves if I know which ones are not absolutely going to kill me if I'm totally starving but are they going to be my first choice no
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's nothing to eat down there other than a seasonal fruit maybe an animal if I can catch it if I can find a beehive I'll get some honey I'm not going to go eating bitter leaves if I can hunt something that has more nutritional value more calories and more payoff to me in the end