The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And the main reason that he communicated to me, and again, I'm hoping I'm representing this accurately, he can correct me if I'm not, is that he was concerned about his iron levels and his cholesterol. That was the reason he went vegan. He didn't feel bad. He just didn't want his cholesterol to be so high.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.