The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
providing us with unique nutrients calories saturated fats DHEA EPA micronutrients like pyridoxine vitamin B6 riboflavin folate liver is full of vitamin A all sorts of nutrients that were in short supply prior to that when we were mostly frugivorous or omnivorous primates or primate hominids eating very little amounts of meat perhaps previously scavengers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
eating meat made us human I believe strongly and other historians have corroborated this like our human species would I think there's such strong evidence for that never have become who we are Homo erectus and we'll have less Homo sapiens without the unique nutrients the fatty nutrients the fat soluble nutrients the vitamins the minerals found in meat and organs when we became prolific Hunters