The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
then somewhere around the 1950s I think it was Eisenhower uh had a heart attack and there was a whole storm around like the narrative and you know like we're gonna blame this unsaturated fat and then Ansel Keys comes in and does the seven country studies which is totally um just looks at seven countries in the world where they could correlate saturated fat intake and heart disease and leaves out the other 16 studies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.