We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
no we i don't think we would and i don't think we would view it as a good thing if that if that because again if you're telling me that someone needs to lose 30 of their body weight presumably their body composition isn't great to begin with so no i think you would you would view that as maybe a better thing than where they started but not optimal either
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.