The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it was a very short study it was a four-week study and it put athletes on a very low carbohydrate diet they averaged less than 10 percent and maybe 15 protein so they were you know if they weren't on a ketogenic diet they were very close to it and they were doing high intensity interval training and you guys didn't find any difference between the groups suggesting that this amount of carbohydrate restriction did not impair performance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.